Posts Tagged ‘Canada’

The Canadian Media Marketplace from Eh to Zed

Thursday, May 15th, 2008

It may look like any other Starbucks in the United States. People are speaking English and you can order a five shot venti Americano. But if you look closer, something is askew. The woman with a latte in the corner isn’t reading Vogue, she’s reading Flare. The tattooed guy plugged into his iPod isn’t reading Rolling Stone, he’s reading Chart. And the nerdy looking guy? Is that PC Magazine he’s reading? No, it’s Monitor.

Have you stepped into some kind of Bizzaro World? Well, if you take a little closer look, you’ll see everyone has backpacks and every backpack has a red maple leaf. No, this isn’t Bizarro World, it’s Canada. And it’s important for Americans in public relations to understand that, at least in print media, your news stops at the border. Despite the American perception of Canada being a lot like the U.S., it is its own entirely distinct media market.

Before I get to the PR stuff, let me first offer a couple historical and political notes for background. Going back as far as the mid-1960s, the Canadian government has included in its policy for cultural protectionism – that is, a policy to keep Canada Canadian – regulations that made it difficult or at least expensive (tariffs) to bring foreign content into Canada. This policy helped the Canadian magazine market flourish while keeping many American publications out of Canada. Although this was good for Canadian publications, it’s debatable whether the policy was actually good across the board for the Canadian people.

For example, having just won the gold medal in the ‘96 Olympics for the 100 meter dash, Canadian runner Donovan Bailey was beaten out by U.S. runner Michael Johnson for the Associated Press’ “Athlete of the Year” title as he was shut out from balloting due to foreign news being stopped at the Canadian border.

Not too long after, lawsuits filed by U.S. media companies based on NAFTA and the WTO overturned much of Canada’s cultural protectionism policies with respect to publications. An influx of U.S. and other foreign publications, with advertising and content specific to the Canadian marketplace, were making their way to Canadian newsstands. Previously these “split run” publications – one run for the U.S. and a second run for Canada – had been taxed out of existence as part of Canada’s cultural protectionism. Today that’s no longer the case and you can find Time Magazine and Newsweek on the same newsstand as Macleans.

As the lawsuits loomed, there was panic from the Canadian Magazine Publishers Association (now known as Magazines Canada). In a 1997 article in Macleans, the association’s president, Catherine Keachie said, “What does Canada lose? Canadian writing and a Canadian point of view. Should the government choose not to defend this policy, there’s no question it will be a kind of death blow to the Canadian magazine industry.”

Well, despite the fact that U.S. publishers prevailed and the laws were changed, no death blow was dealt to either the magazine industry or Canadian culture. Canadian publications are still the favorite choice of Canadian readers.

Canadian Flag

Therefore it’s critical for U.S.-based PR practitioners to understand the differences in the media market. It’s not unimportant. Toronto (which is not the capitol) ranks right behind New York, Los Angeles and Chicago to be the fourth largest urban area in the English-speaking part of North America, and Calgary is North America’s fastest growing city. While Canadians love what’s home-grown, their proclivities are not so entirely different that they shun products from south of the border. Stated another way, Canadians love Lick’s and Harveys, but there are still lines inside McDonald’s Canada (where you’ll find poutine). That means that if you’re representing a U.S.-made product or service, you can find a market for it in Canada.

They key is to understand how to approach the Canadian media marketplace. Here are some tips:

Know Something About Canada
loonieYou probably don’t need to know that British colonies became the Dominion of Canada in 1867 or that Sir John MacDonald was the first Canadian prime minister. But you will be well served to know when Canada’s national holidays occur, that Canada uses the metric system, Canadians refer to their dollar as the Loonie (because the dollar coin has a loon on it), that the country is bilingual with English and French as official languages, and that its use of English is different from both the U.S. and the U.K. (Incorrect: my favorite theater is on the border with America; correct: my favourite theatre is on the American boundary. Microsoft Word has a Canadian dictionary built in to help you spell check).

Learn the Canadian Publications
A good place to start is the list of Canadian publications to which Businesswire, PR Newswire and Marketwire send press releases. You can find Canadian media contacts in Vocus and other media directory services as well.

Find the Canadian Angle
Canadian editors are more than willing to write about American stuff, but – no surprise – they need to make it relevant to their readers. If you can include some Canadiana in your pitch, you’ll be off to a good start. Do you have any Canadian customers? Are any spokespeople from Canada? Does the company have a physical Canadian presence? Try to make your pitch to Canadian press as Canadian as possible. Without a Canadian angle, your news could be a hard sell.

Look at a Map
Canada is North America’s largest land mass, but that’s not why you should look at a map. It’s because news that is interesting in Western Canada may not be of interest in Eastern Canada. Just as a story that’s interesting to New Yorkers may not have the same caché in Pocatello, a story that plays well in Montreal may not find an audience in Saskatoon (look at a map).

Perhaps the biggest key to working with Canadian reporters, editors and bloggers is not to take for granted that news important in the U.S. will likewise be important in Canada, just as news from outside the U.S. may not be important here. By spending a little time understanding the market, the media and the culture of Canada, your PR efforts north of the border can pay big dividends. And if you’re lucky enough to go on a press tour in Canada (likely Toronto and Montreal), don’t pass up having poutine. Good luck with your PR in Canada.

John S

Self Portrait of a Mobility Nerd

Friday, November 17th, 2006

Despite how cool I must seem to everyone on the exterior, deep down I’m really just a nerd. I blame Dad. When I was 10, Dad came home with an Apple II (not Apple II+ or Apple IIe or Apple IIc… an Apple II; serial number smaller than 1000). That sort of set me on my present course.

So since I’m now a confessed nerd, I can safely share this story. I was with some folks from Talkster in Ottawa for the Voice 2.0 conference. After the conference we headed to downtown Ottawa to play tourist. We found a great little pub near Parliament Hill for dinner. Afterward, we went on a walk around Canada’s capitol.

As we were walking near the Canadian Parliament building, I remembered once being on website that had a link to the Parliament Hill webcam. I pulled out my trusty MoPR Blog Cam, the Cingular 8125, and used the browser to surf to the first website where I indeed found a link to the Parliament Hill webcam. Then I surfed to the webcam (shown live on left).

I picked a spot between two lamp posts where I might be able to see myself on the small image. Then I refreshed the website page and got a new image where I was visible as a tiny, fuzzy dot.

When you enlarge the image, as you clearly see below, I appear as a much larger, fuzzy dot (that’s me in the red circle).

The other three fuzzy dots near Centennial Flame (in the bottom middle of the picture) are James Wanless, Maria Puccio and Mark Gelman of Talkster.

technorati tags:
del.ico.us tags:
icerocket tags:

Quad-C Group Review

Saturday, August 19th, 2006

There are a number of contenders vying for leadership in the Candy Coated Chocolate Confection (Quad-C) race, but only two clearly dominate the market. Even the best of the dozen or so also-rans can merely be the third horse in a two-horse race.

M&Ms from Mar’s and their predecessor, Smarties from Nestle are the two clear market leaders. However, it is hard to choose a clear market winner between these two Quad-C rivals as they rarely compete in the same geographic market. In the United States, M&Ms are the clear choice because Smarties are not available to the US consumer. Likewise Smarties dominates the market in Canada where M&Ms are not available. Assuming you had a choice, which one is better?

We brought the two brands into our test lab and ran them through a rigorous testing regimen executed by two industry experts who frequently consult on Quad-C purchases. Samantha, age 8, and Margo, age 5 and 3/4, have more than a decade combined experience advising on scores of Quad-C purchases. (Photo above by Candyblog).

In most group reviews our experts begin by noting price. In this review our experts focused first on volume. Price was irrelevant for two key reasons. First, the Smarties were purchased in Canada and the M&Ms in the United States. Factoring the exchange rate and the cost of gasoline consumption into the price made the math too difficult even for our editorial staff, so we lined-out that criterion from our review. Second, Samantha and Margo have never paid for candy in their lives and really don’t care about price. If necessary, dad can always pay with a credit card.

Focusing on package volume, Margo noted that more Smarties came in the box than did M&Ms from the bag. She was right, as the standard grocery-store-shelf-sized box of Smarties contained 56 grams of candy whereas the standard grocery-store-shelf-sized bag of M&Ms only had 47.9 grams. Samantha then noted that Smarties came in a box and M&Ms in a bag.

Comparing nutritional value, we noted that the US bag of M&Ms have 240 calories while the Canadian box of Smarties had 1070 kJ of “energie.” More confusing still was that the M&Ms possessed 10 g of fat while Smarties had 7.6 g of something called “matieres grasses.”

We also compared the ingredients list of the two products. M&Ms has a list of wholesome ingredients including sugar, chocolate, skim milk and milk fat. Forgetting for a moment that it seems more efficient to use lowfat milk rather than adding milk fat to skim milk, M&Ms would seem to have the healthiest list of ingredients. Of course M&Ms’ ingredient list ends with the secret code “red 40 lake, yellow 6, yellow 5, blue 2 lake, etc.” Smarties’ ingredients include, among other things, sucre, substances laitieres, farine de ble, amidon de mais modifie and colorant. We at TheMoPRBlog don’t know what any of that means, but we’re pretty sure we’re falling in love.

Our initial confusion about the nutritional information turned to well-placed apathy and both our experts agreed that nutritional metrics or the list of ingredients should never play a factor in a Quad-C purchase decision. After all, this is Quad-C and not hamburgers we’re talking about. Margo did point out however that if pepper was ever included in a recipe for candy, stay away from getting that kind, at least for her.

In the end, both Samantha and Margo selected Smarties as the best. Margo observed that Smarties come in pink while M&Ms do not have a pink offering. She further observed that Smarties are larger, allowing for more chocolate per piece. Combining the chocolate per piece ratio to the superior number of pieces per container allows for more chocolate ingestion, despite the 1070 kJs of energie.

Samantha, while also selecting Smarties as her Quad-C recommendation, noted the M&Ms have a thinner candy coating which made the chocolate flavor stand out. However, Smarties come in purple. Because of the harder candy shell on Smarties, Samantha elects to eat hers one at a time while she would feel completely comfortable eating two or three M&Ms at a time. Margo on the other hand prefers to eat as many as she can in one mouthful for either Smarties or M&Ms.

One interesting thing to note, both Smarties (developed first) and M&Ms were created for soldiers to give them a quick burst of energy. This writer can completely understand the logic behind such product development, particularly if the soldiers were between 5 and 3/4 and 8 years of age.

For a completely thorough comparison of these two candy coated chocolate confections, visit the head-to-head comparison on Candyblog.

Looking for a colorful mobility tie-in, it appears these candies have inspired a new line of mobile phone handsets for children. Japanese operator Willcom has introduced a phone named NICO targeted at kids ages 7 to 12, with M&M buttons in Smartie colors.

If you have an opinion on which candy is better, feel free to use this blog as your forum. If you have an opinion on which color NICO phone is best, likewise you’re invited to leave your comments here.

technorati tags:
del.ico.us tags:
icerocket tags: